Elliot G
Spectator
This past weekend was Formula D Throwdown in Monroe, Washington. There were many great moments throughout the event such as JLowe finally making it to Top 16. And there were also many upsets, like the questionable two tire ruling. But by far the biggest issue I saw over the course of the event was the turn around cone on the straight.
Now the turn around cone is a "point of no return" marker for the drivers. It allows for driver who feel they goofed up a start or got an unfair start to stop, turn around and get a do over. The reasoning behind the cone, is due to the fact that Formula D and its judges are pushing for close tandems for beginning to end. For the most part I agree with the idea of the cone because it keeps higher horsepower cars from rocketing off the start and intorducing 5 car+ gaps at high entry speed courses.
So lets skip over to the Conrad and Daigo battle. Now we now Conrad and Daigo have had some heated battles recently, and that tempers will flare. However what went down at Washington this weekend in Top 32 Battle between the two seemed very childish on Conrad's behalf.
As the two lined up their first run, with Daigo leading and Conrad giving chase, everything seemed normal. The starting tree was lit, then signals to go. Daigo begins to take off, but wait Conrad stays at the line. So not having cross the turn around cone, Conrad forces Daigo back to the line. They line up again, they get the light to go, but wait Conrad decides to stay back again.
So we all know exactly what the end result of the run was but, the question is, should drivers be limited to the number of restarts allowed in a row as to prevent them from using it as a tactic to unsettle other drivers?
Now the turn around cone is a "point of no return" marker for the drivers. It allows for driver who feel they goofed up a start or got an unfair start to stop, turn around and get a do over. The reasoning behind the cone, is due to the fact that Formula D and its judges are pushing for close tandems for beginning to end. For the most part I agree with the idea of the cone because it keeps higher horsepower cars from rocketing off the start and intorducing 5 car+ gaps at high entry speed courses.
So lets skip over to the Conrad and Daigo battle. Now we now Conrad and Daigo have had some heated battles recently, and that tempers will flare. However what went down at Washington this weekend in Top 32 Battle between the two seemed very childish on Conrad's behalf.
As the two lined up their first run, with Daigo leading and Conrad giving chase, everything seemed normal. The starting tree was lit, then signals to go. Daigo begins to take off, but wait Conrad stays at the line. So not having cross the turn around cone, Conrad forces Daigo back to the line. They line up again, they get the light to go, but wait Conrad decides to stay back again.
So we all know exactly what the end result of the run was but, the question is, should drivers be limited to the number of restarts allowed in a row as to prevent them from using it as a tactic to unsettle other drivers?
Last edited: